On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 10:43:37AM -0400, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > >>>>> "KY" == Ka-Ping Yee <ping@lfw.org> writes: > > KY> Just a suggestion, but how about sys.consts? Like os.path, as > > KY> in sys.consts.CO_NESTED, sys.consts.CO_FUTURE_DIVISION, etc. > > KY> So there's only one new object in sys, and it can contain the > > KY> weird internal stuff. :) >... > +0. It's the better solution but I bet it's more work to code it than > _sysconst. I'm not volunteering, and I want Tim to have time to help > with the type/class unification, which is behind schedule. Hmm... that sounds a lot like trading off expediency for Rightness. If it is the better solution, then that should be done. If you don't want Tim to work on it, then that is a different problem. It could be done later, or a volunteer could step up to do it. It isn't exactly a time critical change, now is it? Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4