[David Ascher] > My only point is that if the language were to be designed today, my > guess is that those things would be methods (or interfaces :-). [Guido] > Sure. Say what?! What kind of stupid-ass language spells the len() function as if it were a method? That's carrying consistency to an irrational extreme -- trust your decade-old intuition on this one (which was challenged no later than 9 years ago on the same ground). > But they're not so broken as to warrant a redesign. There are > more important battles. Proof: every thread bloats in inverse proportion to its true importance. So there <wink>. incisively y'rs - tim
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4