>>>>> "PP" == Paul Prescod <paulp@ActiveState.com> writes:
PP> Something else I heard at script scape is that for simple
PP> extensions (wrappers around C code) Perl has not only caught
PP> up to Python but surpassed it thanks to inline::C,
PP> inline::Python etc. As soon as you move to doing anything
PP> complicated with the interpreter internals, Python wins again,
PP> but it still annoys me that Perl has leapfrogged us in
PP> wrapping simplicity!
How about a PEP, Paul?!
I've no clue what inline::C or inline::Python do, and no time to learn
about it, but if you have a good grasp of them, try to think about how
those ideas might translate to Python. A PEP on simplifying extension
writing would be welcome.
-Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4