> However, the problem I see with a class-based approach is that this > is such a small thing that I'm not even sure how to write a class > for it that isn't more grandiose than it deserves. Believe me, adding a new method to a heavily-used built-in object is much more grandiose than adding a library module. In addition to "15 lines of code" we need to update the documentation, add a few lines to the test suite, add code to Jython mimicking the feature; 30 books will be a little more out of date, and so on. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4