Skip Montanaro wrote:
>
> The number of tracked objects should be relatively small. All active
> frames of all active threads could conceivably be tracking objects, but
> this seems small compared to the number of functions defined in a given
> application.
Hmmm? That doesn't seem quite right to me. That's just a knee-jerk
reaction, I don't have any real evidence.
As a side note, I'm not sure whether some mention should be made that
TRACK_OBJECT specifically does not work any differently from current
Python when it comes to threads. That is, if it's a shared variable of
any sort, you need a mutex if you're going to perform multiple
operations on it.
--
--- Aahz (@pobox.com)
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 <*> http://www.rahul.net/aahz/
Androgynous poly kinky vanilla queer het Pythonista
I don't really mind a person having the last whine, but I do mind someone
else having the last self-righteous whine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4