Guido: > The general opinion > seems to be that the future statement is redundant, since previous > uses of yield will generally result in a syntax error I thought the future statement was also to give users a release or two of warning before a semantics-changing feature becomes mandatory. Maybe I was wrong about the intention? I don't have particularly strong feelings either way in this case, but people more sensitive to code breakage might. Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+ University of Canterbury, | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a | Christchurch, New Zealand | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc. | greg@cosc.canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4