> GvR> For tools like PyChecker, a higher level is more appropriate: > GvR> give it an abstract syntax tree that can answer questions > GvR> related to the symbol table, so that you can tell for example > GvR> whether 'x = y' assigns a local to a global or vice versa -- > GvR> and if a local is involved, in which function it is defined. > > I'm not sure how much time I can make for it in the 2.2 release > schedule, but I think a high-level source analysis module would be a > valuable addition to the compiler package. We've got pychecker and > pydoc as to drive the requirements. Do you think it's worth making > time for in the 2.2 release schedule? > > Jeremy I think this falls in the "would be nice" category. I hope that non-PythonLabs folks might contribute something of this sort. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4