> I've got to say, the distinction between --with and --enable, no > matter how thoretically pure, in practice seems extremely fuzzy. ... Seeing that I'm in good company wrt my with/enable confusion I'll chime in one last time, there's a couple of cases where with is used that are plainly wrong. --with-suffix is probably the silliest one, as it is provided by autoconf itself. A distinction that I could understand is if 'with' options may require some external stuff (or may be required by some external stuff) and 'enable' were purely internal options. With that definition unicode, gc and malloc are the only 'enable' style options. -- Jack Jansen | ++++ stop the execution of Mumia Abu-Jamal ++++ Jack.Jansen@oratrix.com | ++++ if you agree copy these lines to your sig ++++ www.oratrix.nl/~jack | see http://www.xs4all.nl/~tank/spg-l/sigaction.htm
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4