mal> David Ascher wrote:
>>
>> Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>
>> > IMO not worth it changing the language. Train yourself to write x++
>> > instead. :-)
>>
>> Sounds like an excellent one for PyChecker =)
mal> Why ? ++x can be put to some real use: I have a counter type which
mal> actually uses ++x to increment the counter.
(I've been away for a few days, so perhaps this has been covered already.
I'm still catching up.)
How? ++x compiles to
LOAD_FAST x
UNARY_POSITIVE
UNARY_POSITIVE
I don't see any incrementing going on...
Skip
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4