> On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 11:52:50AM +0200, Jack Jansen wrote: > > > > Do you really need to call the option --with-next-framework? First, I > > > think it should be an --enable option, since you are not offering to > > > use or not to use some external tool or library. > > > I'm unsure, I've never fully understood the intention behind --with and > > --enable. For instance, why is it "--enable-unicode" and "--with-threads"? > > Like Martin explained earlier, '--with' is for options that require or might > require an external package or library, and '--enable' is for enabling a > feature wholy contained in The Software. So you have > --enable-unicode(=type) and --with-threads(=external_threads_package). Ah, thanks, that means that it should with "--with-framework", because there's external stuff involved. -- Jack Jansen | ++++ stop the execution of Mumia Abu-Jamal ++++ Jack.Jansen@oratrix.com | ++++ if you agree copy these lines to your sig ++++ www.oratrix.nl/~jack | see http://www.xs4all.nl/~tank/spg-l/sigaction.htm
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4