"M.-A. Lemburg" wrote: > > David Ascher wrote: > > > > Guido van Rossum wrote: > > > > > IMO not worth it changing the language. Train yourself to write x++ > > > instead. :-) > > > > Sounds like an excellent one for PyChecker =) > > Why ? ++x can be put to some real use: I have a counter > type which actually uses ++x to increment the counter. The point of linters is to find things that are likely to be errors. I claim that ++foo is likely to be an error resulting from the corruption of young minds by C++ more often than deliberate and appropriate. But you could turn it off when you used PyChecker =). --david
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4