David Ascher wrote: > > Guido van Rossum wrote: > > > IMO not worth it changing the language. Train yourself to write x++ > > instead. :-) > > Sounds like an excellent one for PyChecker =) Why ? ++x can be put to some real use: I have a counter type which actually uses ++x to increment the counter. Note that the interpreter sees ++x as +(+x), that is the "+" is interpreted as unary + -- perfectly legal Python if you ask me. -- Marc-Andre Lemburg CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH ______________________________________________________________________ Consulting & Company: http://www.egenix.com/ Python Software: http://www.lemburg.com/python/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4