Neil Schemenauer wrote: > > Neal Norwitz wrote: > > The reason why I chose to use the PVM bytecode was because it was > > faster and easier to get something. I started trying to use ASTs > > but it would have taken a lot longer to get anywhere. > > Couldn't you use Tools/compiler to generate a nice AST? I probably could. Recently, I looked at the tool in 2.2. But I didn't know about the compiler when I started. I looked at pylint (from 1999) and the ASTs that were generated from parser, etc. But it was going to require too much work at the time. And I was just trying to figure out if static analysis was even possible. I've considered the benefits/drawbacks of converting checker to use ASTs. The drawback is how much time it will take to convert, so I haven't done anything....yet. Neal
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4