> I'm not objecting, precisely, but I have an allergic reaction to the way > timed Event() works, even though there's really no other way to work it. > I think that encouraging people to use it is a Bad Idea. Can you elaborate in more detail what your concern about the timed Event() is? This one itself looks fine; if anything, _Condition.wait looks disturbing. Could you also kindly put your comments into http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=5470&atid=305470&func=detail&aid=428326 There are a number of procedural objections with regard to this patch (license, missing documentation); if you can add significant technical objections, that might be a reason to reject it - or to find a better alternative. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4