Martin v. Loewis wrote:
>
> In patch
>
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=428326&group_id=5470&atid=305470
>
> a new threading.Timer class is proposed. Since the patch was submitted
> two months ago, nobody seemed to care enough to comment on it. I like
> it, and I'll commit the patch unless I hear otherwise.
I'm not objecting, precisely, but I have an allergic reaction to the way
timed Event() works, even though there's really no other way to work it.
I think that encouraging people to use it is a Bad Idea.
--
--- Aahz (@pobox.com)
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 <*> http://www.rahul.net/aahz/
Androgynous poly kinky vanilla queer het Pythonista
I don't really mind a person having the last whine, but I do mind someone
else having the last self-righteous whine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4