[Guido] > ... > Anyway, I don't see the point: if you want two 100% independent > interpreters, you can get that easily by forking two separate > processes. That's what separate processes are *for*... So what is it that multiple interpreters within a single process *are* for? I'm comfortable with threads, and comfortable with processes, but multiple interpreters not-really-sharing yet not-really-isolated seem mostly an opportunity to track down subtle bugs <wink>.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4