At 11:35 PM 8/7/2001 +0200, Samuele Pedroni wrote:
>The intention of my last meassage was not to shut down discussion with a
>pessimistic argument, I was just trying to pin down the potential problems,
>maybe the tone was a bit bitter...
Nope, not at all--I do intend to reply. (The tone was fine, BTW) The Real
World just got in the way, as it has this annoying tendency to do. :)
As a quick response (this is from memory, so if it makes no sense don't be
surprised), the current Parrot design's adequate for heavy OO, but could be
a lot better. I'm working on that, and as soon as I've a better
under-the-hood design I'll drop a note and everyone can savage it as
appropriate. (And the more the better, honestly)
FWIW I've thrown the first partial draft of the Parrot assembly language
spec out to the wolves. URL and details available to the interested.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
dan@sidhe.org have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4