Guido van Rossum writes: > Sure. Do you want to take the lead here? Nobody at PythonLabs has > any interest in this, and without someone putting a stake into the > ground, there's no point in even talking about it. It sounds you know > what you're talking about, and you have CVS permission, so if you want > to do it, go ahead. > > (For b/w compatibility we may have to keep the linuxaudio extension > around for a while, in a deprecated state.) Would it make sense to include a Python implementation that wraps aronud whatever low-level modules are needed? Or to use the same API and just replace the implementation? I don't know enough about the potential replacements, but it would be nice to maintain the availability of the API; it's been available for several versions now. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org> PythonLabs at Zope Corporation
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4