> ... >> I think that's a bug in map(). Anyone disagree? [Moshe] > I agree...but when we talked about it in c.l.py, I said that and you > said map() should be deprecated. Why the sudden change of heart? This doesn't ring a bell. I don't even recall *seeing* a msg from you in the .xreadlines() vs map() thread ... > why shouldn't it be changed to > > [whatever(x) for x in file.xreadlines()]? I'm not keen to eradicate map() from the face of the Earth regardless, and until it *is* deprecated (if ever), it's supported. But this is all moot since I already checked in the map() fix. How to deal with the iterator docs is still an important issue.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4