Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2001-April/014437.html below:

[Python-Dev] ineffective optimization: method tables

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] ineffective optimization: method tables
• Next message: [Python-Dev] 'iter' as a function name
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi.

[Neil Schemenauer]
> I did have 2-D tables for binary operations but since they were
> quite sparse I took them out in favor of arrays and case
> statements.  Unfortunately, all my benchmarks show this patch to
> be ineffective in terms of speeding up the interpreter.  Anyone
> know why?
I just noticed that your changes add a 1 more call price also were there was
no such price (int + int, etc), do not know if that matters ...

regards.

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] ineffective optimization: method tables
• Next message: [Python-Dev] 'iter' as a function name
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4