On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 01:00:09PM -0400, Jeremy Hylton wrote: > >>>>> "GvR" == Guido van Rossum <gvanrossum@users.sourceforge.net> writes: > GvR> Log Message: Implement, test and document "key in dict" and > GvR> "key not in dict". > GvR> I know some people don't like this -- if it's really > GvR> controversial, I'll take it out again. (If it's only Alex > GvR> Martelli who doesn't like it, that doesn't count as "real > GvR> controversial" though. :-) > I don't like it either, because it's only clear when it's spelled "for > key in dict". It's pretty confusing when it's spelled "for val in > dict" or even "for x in dict". > But I'm willing to give it a try for a while. Same here (don't like right now, can live with it even though my own experiments w/ innocent colleagues lead me to believe it's not the best thing to do ;) -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4