Tim Peters wrote:
>
>...
>
> >>> 'a' in 'a' == 'a'
> 1
> >>>
>
> thank-god-for-dis.dis-ly y'rs - tim
[potential spoilers below]
No, thank Jeremy for Compiler:
Module(None,
Stmt(
[
Printnl(
[
Compare(Const('a'),
[
('in', Const('abcde')),
('==', Const('abcde'))
]
)
],
None
)
]
)
)
It still took a look at the ref manual for me to figure it out.
It looks like dubious hypergeneralization to me! <0.7 wink> Seriously,
does this "feature" ever make sense to apply to the in operator?
--
Take a recipe. Leave a recipe.
Python Cookbook! http://www.ActiveState.com/pythoncookbook
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4