Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2001-April/014376.html below:

[Python-Dev] Re: [Python-checkins] CVS: python/dist/src/Doc/ref ref3.tex,1.64,1.65 ref5.tex,1.43,1.44

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Class Methods
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: [Python-checkins] CVS: python/dist/src/Doc/ref ref3.tex,1.64,1.65 ref5.tex,1.43,1.44
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>>>>> "GvR" == Guido van Rossum <gvanrossum@users.sourceforge.net> writes:

  GvR> Log Message: Implement, test and document "key in dict" and
  GvR> "key not in dict".

  GvR> I know some people don't like this -- if it's really
  GvR> controversial, I'll take it out again.  (If it's only Alex
  GvR> Martelli who doesn't like it, that doesn't count as "real
  GvR> controversial" though. :-)

I don't like it either, because it's only clear when it's spelled "for
key in dict".  It's pretty confusing when it's spelled "for val in
dict" or even "for x in dict".

But I'm willing to give it a try for a while.

Jeremy

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Class Methods
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: [Python-checkins] CVS: python/dist/src/Doc/ref ref3.tex,1.64,1.65 ref5.tex,1.43,1.44
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4