> GvR> Could we recycle this PEP number for the 2.1.1 release > GvR> schedule (see my previous post here)? That seems easier than > GvR> having a new PEP for each micro-release. > > PEP numbers are a plentiful resource! I'd prefer to give it a new PEP > number. One day I'm going to argue that anything limited to 4 digits can't possibly be called "plentiful", but not this millennium. :-) I didn't mean to save a PEP number -- I just meant to keep the 2.1 followup releases together. I explained this to Barry over lunch and he agrees now. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4