"M.-A. Lemburg" wrote:
> Please write the results of this discussion up as a PEP. PEPs don't
> necessarily have to provide an implementation of what is covered;
> it sometimes simply suffices to start out with a summary of the
> discussions that have been going on. Then someone may pick up the
> threads from there and possibly find a solution which will then
> get implemented.
Just, I second that. I really think this is a very useful improvement to
Python, I'd I'd really like to see it happen. I am probably even more
out of my depth than you when it comes to suggesting impimentation, but
I'd be glad to help with any parts of a PEP that I can.
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > <grin> I'll repeat my question of yesterday: is there any reason why we
> > couldn't start with QIO? I did some checking after I sent that out, and
> > QIO claims that it can be configured to recognize different kinds of
> > line endings. QIO is claimed to be 2-3 times faster than Python 1.5.2;
> > don't know how that compares to 2.x.
>
> >From a one-minute review it looks like as good a start as any!
Great! I have to say that it really seemed that someone must have
produced an open source solution to this problem somewhere, and it turns
out there is something Python related already.
-Chris
--
Christopher Barker,
Ph.D.
ChrisHBarker@home.net --- --- ---
http://members.home.net/barkerlohmann ---@@ -----@@ -----@@
------@@@ ------@@@ ------@@@
Oil Spill Modeling ------ @ ------ @ ------ @
Water Resources Engineering ------- --------- --------
Coastal and Fluvial Hydrodynamics --------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4