> <grin> I'll repeat my question of yesterday: is there any reason why we > couldn't start with QIO? I did some checking after I sent that out, and > QIO claims that it can be configured to recognize different kinds of > line endings. QIO is claimed to be 2-3 times faster than Python 1.5.2; > don't know how that compares to 2.x. >From a one-minute review it looks like as good a start as any! --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4