> mal wrote: > > Any chance of taking a look at it first ? > > same as unicodedatabase.c, just other data. > > > (BTW, what happened to the usual post to SF, review, then > > checkin cycle ?) > > two problems: SF cannot handle patches larger than 500k. > and we're in ship mode... > > > The C type checks are a little performance sensitive since they > > are used on a char by char basis in the C implementation of > > .upper(), etc. -- do the new methods give the same performance ? > > well, they're about 40% faster on my box. ymmv, of course. Fredrik, why don't you make your patch available for review by Marc-Andre -- after all he "owns" this code (is the original author). If Marc-Andre agrees, and Jeremy has enough time to finish the release on time, I have no problem with checking it in. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.pythonlabs.com/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4