mal wrote: > Any chance of taking a look at it first ? same as unicodedatabase.c, just other data. > (BTW, what happened to the usual post to SF, review, then > checkin cycle ?) two problems: SF cannot handle patches larger than 500k. and we're in ship mode... > The C type checks are a little performance sensitive since they > are used on a char by char basis in the C implementation of > .upper(), etc. -- do the new methods give the same performance ? well, they're about 40% faster on my box. ymmv, of course. </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4