Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-September/009373.html below:

[Python-Dev] Is the 2.0 xml package too immature to release?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Is the 2.0 xml package too immature to release?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Is the 2.0 xml package too immature to release?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 05:25:37PM -0500, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>by the XML-sig.  While the original intent was for the XML-sig package
>to be a superset of the core package, this doesn't appear to be
>currently the case, even if the brokenness of the core xml package can
>be fixed.

I'd be more inclined to blame the XML-SIG package; the last public
release is quite elderly, and the CVS tree hasn't been updated to be a
superset of the xml/ package in the Python tree.  However, if you want
to drop the Lib/xml/ package from Python, I have no objections at all;
I never wanted it in the first place.

--amk

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Is the 2.0 xml package too immature to release?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Is the 2.0 xml package too immature to release?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4