Paul wrote: > In the face of all of this confusion the safest thing would be to make > print >> None illegal and then figure it out for Python 2.1. Really? So what's the next feature we'll have to take out after some other python-dev member threatens to leave if he cannot successfully force his ideas onto Guido and everyone else? </F> "I'm really not a very nice person. I can say 'I don't care' with a straight face, and really mean it." -- Linus Torvalds, on why the B in BDFL really means "bastard"
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4