Tim Peters wrote: > >... > > We went over it again at a PythonLabs mtg today, and compared to the other > 20 things on our agenda, when it popped up we all agreed "eh" after about a > minute. It has supporters and detractors, the arguments are getting all of > more elaborate, extreme and repetitive with each iteration, and positions > are clearly frozen already. That's what a BDFL is for. He's seen all the > arguments; they haven't changed his mind; and, sorry, but it's a tempest in > a teapot regardless. All of the little hacks and special cases add up. In the face of all of this confusion the safest thing would be to make print >> None illegal and then figure it out for Python 2.1. -- Paul Prescod - Not encumbered by corporate consensus Simplicity does not precede complexity, but follows it. - http://www.cs.yale.edu/homes/perlis-alan/quotes.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4