Vladimir.Marangozov@inrialpes.fr (Vladimir Marangozov): > The point is that we have two types of garbage: collectable and > uncollectable. I don't think these are the right terms. The collector can collect the "uncollectable" garbage all right -- what it can't do is *dispose* of it. So it should be called "undisposable" or "unrecyclable" or "undigestable" something. Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+ University of Canterbury, | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a | Christchurch, New Zealand | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc. | greg@cosc.canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4