guido wrote: > I want 2.0b1 to be released (don't you?) so I put an extra effort in > to round up Stallman and make sure he and Kahn got on the phone to get > a resolution, and for a blissful few hours I believed it was all done. well, after reading the rest of your mail, I'm not so sure... > After we thought we had reached agreement, Stallman realized that > there are two interpretations of what will happen next: > > 1. BeOpen releases a version for which the license is, purely and > simply, the GPL. > > 2. BeOpen releases a version which states the GPL as the license, > and also states the CNRI license as applying with its text to part > of the code. "to part of the code"? are you saying the 1.6 will be the last version that is truly free for commercial use??? what parts would be GPL-only? </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4