On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 07:39:03PM -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote: > Add parens suggested by gcc -Wall. No! This groups the checks wrong. HASINPLACE(v) *has* to be true for any of the other tests to happen. I apologize for botching the earlier 2 versions and failing to check them, I've been a bit swamped in work the past week :P I've checked them in the way they should be. (And checked, with gcc -Wall, this time. The error is really gone.) > ! else if (HASINPLACE(v) > && ((v->ob_type->tp_as_sequence != NULL && > ! (f = v->ob_type->tp_as_sequence->sq_inplace_concat) != NULL)) > || (v->ob_type->tp_as_number != NULL && > (f = v->ob_type->tp_as_number->nb_inplace_add) != NULL)) > --- 814,821 ---- > return x; > } > ! else if ((HASINPLACE(v) > && ((v->ob_type->tp_as_sequence != NULL && > ! (f = v->ob_type->tp_as_sequence->sq_inplace_concat) > ! != NULL))) > || (v->ob_type->tp_as_number != NULL && > (f = v->ob_type->tp_as_number->nb_inplace_add) != NULL)) -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4