>>>>> "FLD" == Fred L Drake, <fdrake@beopen.com> writes: FLD> Jeremy Hylton writes: >> The change is redundant, as several people pointed out, because >> the C std requires debug to be initialized to 0. I didn't >> realize this. Inadvertently, however, I made the right change. >> The preferred style is to be explicit about initialization if >> other code depends on or assumes that it is initialized to a >> particular value -- even if that value is 0. FLD> According to the BDFL? He's told me *not* to do that if FLD> setting it FLD> to 0 (or NULL, in case of a pointer), but I guess that was FLD> several years ago now (before I went to CNRI, I think). It's these chat sessions. They bring out the worst in him <wink>. Jeremy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4