Greg Wilson: > > > 2. (Lack of) native look and feel. This is a complete show-stopper for > > > many of the outfits I've dealt with (and not just with Python). > > > Guido van Rossum: > > Really? Are you sure that's not just general resistence against new things? > > Well, my students' resistance to novelty is low enough that they're willing to > take a Python course :-). This comes up every time I teach; no idea whether it > has any impact on the usability of completed applications, but I believe it > makes people less likely to choose Tkinter when starting development. As I see it, Tk, like SQL, has the property that it's dead easy to get something crappy running, but it takes a real expert (like /F) to make it good. With wxPython, though, it's easy (if somewhat tedious) to get something good - at least as far as normal "forms" style GUIs. I'm not taking sides - I dabble in both and will never be an expert at either. But for clients using Windows, I use wxPython because it's indistinguishable from native Win32. (BTW, MFC is lagging further and further behind native Win32 - I believe MS considers it "legacy".) - Gordon
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4