>>>>> "GW" == Greg Wilson <gvwilson@nevex.com> writes:
GW> 2. (Lack of) native look and feel. This is a complete
GW> show-stopper for many of the outfits I've dealt with (and not
GW> just with Python).
On the other hand, it's incredibly easy to whip together a GUI in Tk
for simple applications. Yes, Tk gets painful as applications grow,
but I'd hate to abandon such a simple, well-known toolkit for a
complicated, hard-to-learn but powerful native look-and-feel one. You
don't /always/ care about strict native LAF.
Or to restate: I'd hate to have to make that choice. If we can't
satisfy both requirements (mandatory-native-LAF and rapid prototyping
friendliness), we may need to continue to support multiple toolkits.
the-delicious-aroma-of-the-first-GUI-bakeoff-still-in-the-air-ly y'rs,
-Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4