> Right. Cross-platform is very important, but so is native > look-and-feel, and this is where (IMO) XPFE falls flat on its face. Actually, my experience with XPFE from a look-and-feel POV has been pretty positive. It is true they have re-implemented most widgets rather than use native ones, and also true that you can make these widgets look nothing like native LAF - but generally, my experience with Mozilla and the "classic" skin is that it is close enough that it is very hard to tell. It looks more like "subtle enhancements", in the same way IE provides "subtle enhancements" > seems like it could be a real winner. If the x-platform GUI doesn't > use native dialog boxes and filechoosers, users REALLY notice this and Agreed. However, XPFE works fine here IMO. Again, I do not want to propose XPFE as viable today, and I agree it may never be viable. Most other critisisms posted are valid, but I don't think that LAF is one such problem with XPFE. Mark.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4