On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 09:19:38PM +0200, Thomas Wouters wrote: > On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 01:31:34PM -0500, Charles G Waldman wrote: [ DEC threads (OSF1) are not automatically detected, causing a compilation failure on such systems ] > > It would be nice if configure were smart enough to figure this out! > ... we can easily add that. See the attached patch ... Charles, if you get a chance to test this patch before monday, please do. I think it's important to try and get the thread compiling right, now that threads are on by default. This is going to create a lot of confusion with OSF-users that don't read the README all the way through! If you can't test it, perhaps we can apply it before 2.0 none the less. I personally think there are more systems calling themselves OSF1 that do need the -threads argument than there are that don't need it (if any) and the patch only adds -threads if threads are really enabled. (Or perhaps change the patch to read 'OSF1)' instead of 'OSF*)' in the case stmt, to be conservative.) -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4