Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-October/009864.html below:

[Python-Dev] Re: [Python-checkins] CVS: python/dist/src/Python ceval.c,2.207,2.208

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: [Python-checkins] CVS: python/dist/src/Python ceval.c,2.207,2.208
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: [Python-checkins] CVS: python/dist/src/Python ceval.c,2.207,2.208
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Guido van Rossum wrote:

> > Can't user Python code, fiddling around with bytecode, produce garbled
> > bytecode? In that case, it seems  even better to raise an exception.
> 
> Yes, they can produce garbled bytecode, and if that is detected, it's
> not safe to proceed.  So a fatal error is the right thing.

The problem with letting Python code cause fatal errors is that it makes
restricted execution much more difficult. Well, something to think about
for 2.1...

--
Moshe Zadka <moshez@math.huji.ac.il>
There is no IGLU cabal.
http://advogato.org/person/moshez

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: [Python-checkins] CVS: python/dist/src/Python ceval.c,2.207,2.208
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: [Python-checkins] CVS: python/dist/src/Python ceval.c,2.207,2.208
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4