On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 12:04:52AM -0700, Tim Peters wrote: > default: > fprintf(stderr, "Invalid argument to DUP_TOPX: %d!\n", oparg); Hm, this fprintf is stray debugging code, added because I wasn't sure that a SystemError wouldn't crash the interpreter, given that the stack is utterly fu*d up at this point and we don't know what the compiler thinks is the stack size or block size here. (The snippet doesn't show it, but it also raises a SystemError.) Is it okay if I remove/comment this fprintf() before 2.0 final ? (At least it didn't say "awoogah, stray debugging code detected, this machine will self-destruct in 10 seconds" :-) Another-day-another-demerit<wink>-ly y'rs, -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4