A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-October/009746.html below:

[Python-Dev] Proposal -- makefile patches and scripts to generate python RPMs

[Python-Dev] Proposal -- makefile patches and scripts to generate python RPMs [Python-Dev] Proposal -- makefile patches and scripts to generate python RPMsJeremy Hylton jeremy@beopen.com
Wed, 4 Oct 2000 17:35:26 -0400 (EDT)
>>>>> "ESR" == Eric S Raymond <esr@snark.thyrsus.com> writes:

  ESR> In the course of maintaining fetchmail, I've developed
  ESR> effective techniques for integrating RPM and lsm generation
  ESR> into the release machinery of a package.  I'm willing to do
  ESR> this for Python; it will involve adding a makefile production
  ESR> and a couple of scripts to the distribution.

  ESR> The benefit would be that we could generate correct RPMs
  ESR> automatically and ship them with each release.  I think RPM is
  ESR> a sufficiently important distribution format to justify this
  ESR> effort.  Comments?

We are now distributing RPMs for RH 6 with Python and have plans to
support other distributions we have access to, namely those available
on the SF compile farm.

This page has the RPMs:
http://www.pythonlabs.com/products/python2.0/download_python2.0b2.html

Can you compare this approach to using a hand-crafted .spec file for
the RPMs?  It took a little while to figure out how to generate the
.spec, but now that it has been created it does not seem hard to
maintain.

I imagine, without knowing any details of what you propose, that this
is primarily beneficial for people who do not know how to build RPMs.

Jeremy




RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4