Please excuse my ignorance... I am in the process of applying the patch to prevent 1.5/1.6 extensions crashing 2.0 under Windows. Based on the feedback here (ie, "this should be a short term patch"), the various other patches that try to do the same thing, and the belief by some that we should be more like Unix anyway, I believe we should try and capture this entire issue in a more formal manner. The 2 logical places would be as a bug, and in pep42. However, after applying this patch, it doesnt really qualify as a bug! Putting it in pep42 is slightly suspect, as it is not a thought-out feature request yet - however, I believe capturing it there, with links to the relevant patches and discussions would be valuable. So, assuming this sounds reasonable - a bug, or pep42? If pep42, what is the procedure for changing it? I couldnt find it (or any pep) in the CVS repository, and the source-force pages would show me the peps, but not their source. I do remember seeing this mentioned some time ago, but can't locate that mail either... Thanks, Mark.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4