Guido van Rossum [guido@python.org] wrote: > [Argument for the continued viability of OpenStep noted.] > > > I think it should be auto-detected, there's just no reason not to. > > The uname of a MacOS X box is quite different than a Mac OX 9 box > > (which has no uname :-). Hopefully we can get a chance to look at > > this at work this week. > > Hm... That might not get there in time for the 2.0 Release Candidate, > and after that it's an absolute code freeze (with exceptions only for > showstopper bugfixes) until 2.0 is released. > > I guess MacOS X itself is still in beta, so we can afford to require > the creation of additional patches to fully support it after 2.0 is > released. MacOS X is in beta until Q1 (and I'd bet the END of Q1), so if there's a 2.1 planned sometime around there, which I believe there is, then it'd be fine to roll it into that level in my opinion. Chris -- | Christopher Petrilli | petrilli@amber.org
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4