On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Greg Wilson wrote:
> > Barry Warsaw wrote:
> > {}.pop() sounds like the right thing given its symmetry with [].pop().
> > [details]
>
> Should we then add dict.push(), which would add a key/value pair to the
> dictionary? I realize it's redundant (same effect as 'dict[x] = y'),
> but I think anyone who's gone through a CS course in data structures
> and algorithms will expect push() where there's pop(), and it will allow
> functions to be polymorphic over lists and dicts.
'cept there's no list.push - and I don't think you're proposing spelling
"dict.push" "dict.append", are you?
Cheers,
M.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4