> How about an operator, then? > > We already have % rather than a string.format or some such. > Presumably this is because Guido thought it was such a handy > thing that it should be instantly available at our fingertips. > I think a similar argument could be made for string.join, and > also its inverse string.split. > > So, how about: > > x & s == string.join(x, s) > > s1 | s2 == string.split(s1, s2) I don't see the mnemonic. (For %, the mnemonic is clear: %s, %d etc.) --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4