Well, another proof of the bugs in the PEP process -- my remarks were
lost, so I'll send them here.
Let me note that almost everything Greg Wilson wants to do can be done
via a Python class implementing a set using a dictionary mapping to None.
Almost?
* No builitin syntax: import Set;Set(1,2,3) instead of {1,2,3}
* Convertors: if we want list/tuple to have a semblance of efficiency,
we'll need to cache the element list as a list when accessed by
index.
* Two different constructors: set() for building from sequence, Set()
for building from elements. Might be confusing.
* Only possible elements of a set are immutables. OTOH, I'm not sure
how Greg intends to implement his sets if these sets are allowed
to contain mutable elements.
--
Moshe Zadka <sig@zadka.site.co.il>
This is a signature anti-virus.
Please stop the spread of signature viruses!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4