A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-November/010693.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP Process Inefficient?

[Python-Dev] PEP Process Inefficient?Trent Mick trentm@ActiveState.com
Wed, 22 Nov 2000 08:38:51 -0800
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 12:16:09PM +0100, M . -A . Lemburg wrote:
> Moshe Zadka wrote:
> > > In the meantime, I think PEP discussions ought to taken to the
> > > sig mailing lists using python-dev as fallback solution.
> > 
> > I think most of the PEPs are not in the charter of any new sig, and
> > python-dev is invitation only forum. Perhaps having pep-xxx-sig would
> > solve it too?
> 
> I don't think people would sign up for each and every PEP...
> and you know how hard it is to even move a discussion from
> one forum to another -- this either doesn't work out or 
> kills discussion.
> 
> I think the simplest solution would be something like the
> SF bug manager. I'm pretty sure that other projects on SF
> have similar problems, so this might be worthwhile dicussing
> with the SF folks. The technology and user interface are there,
> it would only take a few new tables in the database.


A Roundup mailing list with a category for each PEP?

Trent

-- 
Trent Mick
TrentM@ActiveState.com



RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4