A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-November/010681.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP Process Inefficient?

[Python-Dev] PEP Process Inefficient? [Python-Dev] PEP Process Inefficient?Moshe Zadka Moshe Zadka <moshez@math.huji.ac.il>
Wed, 22 Nov 2000 12:27:10 +0200 (IST)
On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:

> The original idea was for PEP authors to include the important
> parts of those discussions in summary in the PEP -- AFAIK, this
> is not done :-(

I'm trying to do this. However, summarising every e-mail sent to me
about this PEP is quite a burden.

> Hmm, wouldn't something like the SF bug manager be the ideal
> platform ? Perhaps someone could get the SF guys to add something
> like an "idea" manager with similar functionality but different
> content to SF ?!

Yeah, that would work to.

> In the meantime, I think PEP discussions ought to taken to the
> sig mailing lists using python-dev as fallback solution.

I think most of the PEPs are not in the charter of any new sig, and
python-dev is invitation only forum. Perhaps having pep-xxx-sig would
solve it too?

--
Moshe Zadka <moshez@math.huji.ac.il> -- 95855124
http://advogato.org/person/moshez




RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4