> Thomas Heller wrote:
> >
> > imputil, which is now an official part of
> > python, changes the semantics of sys.path
> > as soon as importers are installed.
> >
> > On the other hand, a quick and dirty search
> > finds at least these files in the standard library
> > where it is assumed that sys.path is a list of strings:
> >
> > linecache.py, profile.py, pdb.py, pyclbr.py
> >
> > Should imputil be fixed to install the ImportManager
> > in a different way (not installing the importers
> > into sys.path), or should the library be fixed?
[MAL]
>
> My understanding was that Importers need to provide
> a __str__ method which is then used... haven't looked
> at imputil.py in ages though, so I can't really comment.
>
No importer currently does define __str__, neither is it used
in the standard libary. The pattern is (in linecache):
for dirname in sys.path:
fullname = os.path.join(dirname, basename)
> Perhaps imputil.py should leave sys.path alone (or maybe just
> wipe it from unneeded entries) and use a new sys.importers
> object for the import management ?!
This sounds better.
Thomas
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4